Markets Technology Telecom/Media Real Estate Arena Plus
About us   Register   Contact   Forums   Newsletters   Advertise   Set as homepage  




Also in this section :
Commtouch gets lifeline: $3 mln private placement
Bank Leumi employees won't cooperate on privatization
“The New York Times”: Citibank considering cutting ties with Arab bank suspected of channeling funds to Hamas
Amdocs doesn’t disappoint, exceeds analysts’ forecasts
Paradigm Geophysical meets forecasts: revenue exceeds $20 mln
Second time around: ECI issues Q4 profit warning, lowers expectations for all of 2000
Shocks at Radware: US CEO, VP marketing resign
Radware: We detect no deterioration in US activity; we wish leavers success
Richter negotiating to pay only 25% capital gains tax on Medinol sale
Challenge Fund leads $20 million investment in Witcom
Pele-Phone expects $45 mln loss, 15% increase in revenue in 2000
Direct Insurance about to buy Personal-Direct Insurance at reduced price
Histadrut won’t intensify sanctions until Thursday
Marc Rich pardon followed appeal by Barak to Clinton
EU ambassador: Good chance for cooperation with IAI under Sixth Framework Program
On brink of recession: Leading indicators index falls 0.3% in December









Israel Suspected of Tapping White House Phone Lines Using Amdocs’ Equipment; Amdocs Shares Fall


Ran Dagoni, Washington
08.05.2000 17:57

The shares of NASDAQ-traded Amdocs fell on Friday. It is not clear whether the development was related to the fact that the company’s name had been mentioned in connection with allegations that Israel had been tapping the phone lines of US Administration officials.

Amdocs’ share fell 2.92% to $70 and $1,116 at the close of trading on Friday, having risen $025 on the previous day. Turnover was low, with 330,900 shares changing hands on Friday, compared with 844,500 on Thursday. This may indicate that investors were in no rush to sell off the share in the wake of the press reports.

Amdocs’ real test will be tomorrow, the first day of trading following the publication of the allegations.

Israeli sources assessed yesterday that allegations that Israel was tapping US Administration phone lines were “a storm in a tea cup”. According to the same sources, the accusations were removed from the agenda after two senior Federal Bureau of Investigation officials stated that a year-long investigation failed to produce evidence against Israel.

The publication of the allegations, first in “Insights”, a periodical affiliated with right-wing daily “Washington Times”, and then by Internet newspapers, notably “Drudge Report”, caused grave discomfort to Israeli circles in Washington.

”Insight” said the allegations were based on dozens of sources, including intelligence sources. According to “Insight”, the FBI is convinced that Amdocs equipment has been used to break into the White House telephone system.

The denial by two senior FBI officials, highlighted by the “New York Times” and other media, refuted the report of “Insight”, which is known for its hostile reports with regard to the Clinton-Gore Administration.

”An intensive investigation has been conducted. There simply were no facts to corroborate the allegations that the Administration’s phone system has been broken into”, one source said.

Mark Regev, the spokesman of Israel’s Embassy in Washington, told “Globes”: “Israel is not spying in Washington”. He said that the accusations were scandalous, adding “I don’t even listen in on my wife’s phone calls”.

Amdocs’ spokesman Dan Ginsburg said that the company was not aware of the FBI investigation. “We welcome the opportunity to cooperate with the investigators or with any investigation whatsoever. We haven’t been contacted by the FBI or any other US government agency”, he said.

Published by Israel's Business Arena on 7 May, 2000


 Would you like to read more articles like this one?

  No 1 2 3 4 5 Yes  
Print article   Send to a friend   Save article 



home



  Markets  Technology  Telecom/Media  Real Estate  Arena Plus
About us Register Contact Forums Newsletters Advertise Set as homepage
Market data


 


Disclaimer

This site is best viewed using Microsoft Explorer v.501